A computerized or automated system with documented evidence that it reliably performs as intended for a defined regulated use.
A **validated system** is a computerized or automated system for which there is documented evidence and justification that it consistently performs as intended for a defined use, within a specified environment, and under a defined level of control.
In regulated manufacturing environments, the term most often refers to:
– Software systems (e.g., MES, LIMS, ERP modules, QMS, WMS)
– Embedded or automation systems (e.g., PLC-based equipment control, data loggers)
– Integrated solutions where multiple components operate together as one system of record
Validation is tied to a specific intended use and configuration, not to the product or vendor in general.
A system is typically described as “validated” when:
– Its **intended use and requirements** are clearly defined and documented.
– **Risk-based testing and verification** activities demonstrate that requirements are met.
– The **configuration, version, and environment** (infrastructure, interfaces) are controlled.
– **Data integrity, security, and traceability** controls are defined and verified.
– There is a **documented validation package**, such as:
– Requirements and risk assessments
– Test plans, protocols, and executed test records
– Deviations and resolutions
– Summary or report justifying the validation conclusion
– There are **ongoing controls** to maintain the validated state, such as change control and periodic review.
The term describes a **state of control and evidence**, not a one-time activity.
In industrial and regulated manufacturing environments, a validated system commonly refers to:
– **Manufacturing execution systems (MES)** used for e-records, batch tracking, and electronic signatures
– **Warehouse or inventory systems** that hold the official inventory of record
– **Quality management systems (QMS)** managing deviations, CAPA, and release decisions
– **Automation and data acquisition systems** used for release-by-exception, equipment qualification, or environmental monitoring
In these settings, labeling a system as “validated” typically means it is approved for use in workflows that affect product quality, patient or end-user safety, or regulatory submissions.
A validated system *is*:
– The **specific software and configuration** that has been verified for a defined use
– The **combination of application, infrastructure, and interfaces** as they existed at the time of validation and as controlled through change management
A validated system is *not*:
– A guarantee that software is error-free or suitable for **all** possible uses
– A blanket property of a **commercial product** (e.g., “this vendor’s MES is validated”). Validation attaches to how it is implemented and used at a given site.
– The same as **equipment qualification** (although the two are often related); equipment may be qualified without the control system software being fully validated for all functions.
– **”Vendor validated” vs. site validated**: Vendors may perform extensive testing, but a system is commonly considered validated only when the *using organization* has completed its own validation activities for its intended use and environment.
– **Validated vs. qualified**: “Qualified” often applies to equipment or utilities (e.g., IQ/OQ/PQ). A validated system usually emphasizes the full lifecycle of a computerized system, including requirements, testing, data integrity, and change control.
– **Validated vs. compliant**: A system can be validated without implying legal or regulatory compliance in all respects. Validation documents evidence of fitness for intended use; it does not constitute a formal certification.
When discussing inventory accuracy KPIs and review cadences, a **validated system** usually means the inventory or ERP/MES module that serves as the system of record for quantities, locations, and movements.
In this context:
– KPI definitions, reports, and automated calculations are often expected to run **within or from a validated system** when they influence quality- or compliance-relevant decisions.
– Changes to inventory logic, data structures, or KPI calculations are typically managed through **formal change control** to preserve the validated state.
– Governance processes (such as daily checks, weekly trends, and monthly reviews) are structured so that metrics relying on validated systems remain traceable to controlled configurations and data sources.