ISO 22400 defines a structured set of manufacturing KPIs grouped into logical categories so plants can build a consistent, comparable KPI model instead of ad‑hoc metrics. The exact list and wording depend on the specific part of ISO 22400 and the edition you are using, but the main KPI categories typically include:
These describe how much of the planned time equipment or lines are actually able to run:
In practice, these are often mapped into the availability component of OEE. In brownfield environments, the limiting factor is usually reliable event capture from legacy machines and MES, not the definitions themselves.
These focus on how effectively capacity is converted into output:
These metrics are sensitive to how you model product mix, rework, and changeovers. In regulated operations you typically must document the chosen formulas, assumptions, and any plant-specific adaptations.
These cover compliance of produced units with specifications:
In ISO 22400, quality KPIs are defined in relation to produced units and time periods, not regulatory outcomes. In aerospace and other regulated sectors, you normally integrate these with QMS data (NCRs, CAPA, MRB) and maintain traceability from KPI calculations back to original records.
These relate to consumption of materials, utilities, and equipment versus useful output:
Implementing this category usually requires integration with building management systems, energy meters, and material issue/return data in ERP, which can be nontrivial to validate and sustain in long-lifecycle facilities.
These focus on how materials and WIP move through the manufacturing system:
In brownfield plants, these metrics depend on consistent routing data, lot tracking, and timestamps across MES, ERP, and sometimes manual travelers. Misaligned master data often matters more than the standard definition.
These describe how human resources are used in the manufacturing process:
ISO 22400 treats these as operational KPIs, not HR performance metrics. In regulated environments, you must align them with training and qualification records without exposing personal data beyond what is justified.
These link operational performance to asset condition and maintenance:
These are often sourced from a CMMS/EAM system rather than MES. Full replacement of existing maintenance systems is rarely justified; a more realistic approach is mapping CMMS events into the ISO 22400 downtime and availability model with clear data ownership and change control.
ISO 22400 provides a common vocabulary and structure, but it is not a plug-and-play implementation:
ISO 22400 does not guarantee compliance or audit outcomes. It is a reference for consistent KPI definitions. You still need to choose which KPIs are relevant to your processes, implement them in your existing system landscape, and maintain them under your quality and IT governance.
Whether you're managing 1 site or 100, Connect 981 adapts to your environment and scales with your needs—without the complexity of traditional systems.
Whether you're managing 1 site or 100, C-981 adapts to your environment and scales with your needs—without the complexity of traditional systems.